I support funding of innovative video projects driving demand to the network, but am voting no on LIP-92 because I’m still of the opinion that one can’t expect equal altruism from “good” (by shared social values) actors on a network when rent-seeking behaviour by others isn’t addressed first.
Furthermore if a cut is taken equally from all operators, I think the effectiveness of the program should be first proven at smaller scale. As highlighted in the discussion topic by the Messari chads, to warrant a 1% cut there would need to be a 225% increase in demand. Wouldn’t it be better if we could prove that we can reach that goal first ?
The discussion on this can be found in these forum topics: